1 Kajigrel

New York Times Legalization Of Cannabis Essay

On Monday, one dispensary in San Diego reported a 40-minute wait for customers. And the line lengthened later in the day at the Berkeley Patients Group, perhaps once people had slept off the effects of the New Year’s reveling. By day’s end, it reported serving 1,500 customers.

Yet for many Californians the novelty of readily accessible marijuana wore off a long time ago. The Sacramento Bee ran a legalization story on Monday with the headline: “Where are all the people?”

A photographer friend in Minnesota emailed me a question when I told him I had spent New Year’s Day reporting on legalized pot: “Now what will the rebellious set do to feel rebellious?”

California Online

(Please note: We regularly highlight articles on news sites that have limited access for nonsubscribers.)

• Don’t call it state income tax. It’s a donation to the people of California. The (pie in the sky?) ideas that lawmakers in high-tax states are considering to blunt the impact of the newly passed Republican tax overhaul. [The New York Times]

• The California Republican strategy for electoral survival this year: repeal the gas tax. [Opinion: Sacramento Bee]

• As state lawmakers move forward with investigations of allegations of sexual harassment in the state capital — and shortcomings in the reporting and disciplinary system designed to prevent them — witnesses want assurances that the investigations will be independent and not controlled by state lawmakers. [Sacramento Bee]

A driving and cannabis dilemma: Unlike the nationally accepted 0.08 percent blood alcohol concentration limit used in D.U.I. arrests, there’s no scientific consensus on a base blood level of THC that can prove impairment. [San Francisco Chronicle]

• The wholesale price of pot is crashing as California farmers flood the market with marijuana. They are taking advantage of a grace period during which dispensaries can sell unregulated cannabis grown on the black market. [East Bay Express]

• Inside the Hollywood home of social media’s stars: A visit to an apartment complex filled with YouTube entrepreneurs and “influencers.” Videos shot there have been watched billions of times. [The New York Times]

• A Los Angeles institution — the LA Weekly — has been sold and has turned away from its liberal roots. A former editor, Harold Meyerson, warns that “the Weekly without its liberal, anti-establishment politics is like ‘Hamlet’ without the prince.” [Los Angeles Times]

• Some people on the West Coast want to get off the water grid. “Tap water? You’re drinking toilet water with birth control drugs in them.” [The New York Times]

• More than 150 people were reportedly stung by stingrays over the course of three days in Orange County. Possible cause: unusually warm weather. [Hollywood Patch]

• Dogs and cats react very differently to natural disasters. One woman in Santa Rosa is leading the hunt for “fire cats” — the pets that fled when the firestorms engulfed parts of Sonoma County in October. Many are still on the loose. [The New York Times]

And Finally …

For Northern California football fans the season ended upside down. Neither Bay Area team is going to the playoffs but the underdog 49ers finished the season on the ascendant with QB Jimmy Garoppolo leading the team to five straight wins, the only NFL team to go undefeated in December. And the erstwhile Super Bowl-dreaming Raiders fired their head coach Jack Del Rio after a very disappointing season that included losing the last four games.

For Garoppolo, who made what was a terrible team look unbeatable, it’s time to float some big salary numbers with the 49ers management. Does he want to return next year?

“Um, I like being here,” a poker-faced Garoppolo told reporters. “We had a good thing going at the end of this year. You know, we’ll see what happens.”

Ka-ching.

California Today goes live at 6 a.m. Pacific time weekdays. Tell us what you want to see: CAtoday@nytimes.com.

California Today is edited by Julie Bloom, who grew up in Los Angeles and graduated from U.C. Berkeley.

Continue reading the main story

Two of the most important questions for consumers — how much the legal product will cost and how much it will it be taxed — are still being debated by the two levels of government.

In most of the country, it is still unclear whether marijuana will be sold only in government-run stores. And most provinces have yet to decide the amount of marijuana that individuals will be able to possess or grow.

Nor have most provincial governments decided on the minimum age for buyers, or where smoking marijuana will be legal. The federal government must also explain how it will deal with international drug treaties that prohibit marijuana sales.

Even the precise starting date for legal pot is a mystery.

On top of that, and perhaps counterintuitively, police forces are warning that successful inauguration of a legal system for selling marijuana will require an accompanying crackdown on the black market.

Despite all these challenges, suppliers are optimistic that legal recreational sales will be a reality by summer.

“I 100 percent think Canada will be ready,” said John Fowler, the chief executive of Supreme, which has been selling medical marijuana since 2016. “But I think the real question is: What does ‘ready’ mean?”

The answer, Mr. Fowler said, will be managing expectations in the early days.

“Canadians should not expect that on Day 1, the legal market is going to supply the billions of dollars of illegal cannabis being consumed in Canada,” he said in his windowless office at the greenhouse complex near the shore of Lake Huron where employees work in disposable suits and hairnets to avoid contaminating the multimillion-dollar crop. “That will take time, and I think that’s fine.”

Even with the uncertainty, many investors are betting there is money to be made on legal marijuana. Last month, Constellation Brands, a major wine and beer distributor in the United States, invested $245 million in Canopy Growth, the owner of several licensed medical marijuana growers in Canada.

While the commercial side is upbeat, many provincial leaders say Mr. Trudeau’s timetable of legalization by July — one of his main campaign promises — is unrealistic. Some have demanded a delay.

In a statement, Brad Wall, the premier of Saskatchewan, said that he and several of his counterparts believed a postponement was needed to deal with all the questions.

“Despite these concerns, the federal government has not changed its timetable,” Mr. Wall said.

Speaking with reporters last month, Brian Pallister, the premier of Manitoba, said that his province is reluctantly working to meet the federal government’s schedule.

“That doesn’t mean I like it,” he said. “I’m going to continue to express my concerns about the rapidity of this change.”

But Bill Blair, the former police chief of Toronto and a Liberal member of Parliament tasked by Mr. Trudeau with overseeing the marijuana issue, said that the government will stick with its plan. He dismissed suggestions that the process was rushed, noting that the federal government had been discussing the issue with provinces for two years.

“I don’t minimize the complexity of the work ahead,” Mr. Blair said on Friday. “But by establishing a date for implementation, it’s focused the process.” Further delay, he added, “just facilitates vast windfalls of profit to criminal enterprises.”

Of the three provinces that have released broad outlines, the plans put forth by Ontario and Alberta, although sketchy, treat marijuana much like alcohol.

In Alberta, marijuana will be available in licensed, privately owned shops. Ontario, which has a population of 13.6 million spanning two time zones, will set up 150 government-owned stores. The buying ages will be 18 in Alberta, 19 in Ontario. (Ontario introduced legislation for its new system this past week, but many important details will come later.)

How the provinces and the federal government will divide the tax revenue is still unclear. Governments do not want a repeat of their experience with cigarettes, in which high taxes intended to discourage smoking created a large black market.

Many police forces are among the groups calling for a delay. While a new law will allow the police to use saliva tests to identify marijuana-impaired drivers, what will qualify as impairment has yet to be defined. Little equipment to conduct the tests is now in the field, and few officers have been trained in its use.

“Are we going to be ready?” asked Mario Harel, the president of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and the head of the force in Gatineau, Quebec. “We don’t think so. We’re dealing with a lot of situations so we’re going to be doing our best to be as ready as possible.”

While some Canadians are questioning the accuracy of saliva tests, Robert Mann, a scientist at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health who studies cannabis use, said the tests have proved valid in other countries, although he acknowledged that marijuana’s active ingredient was not as easily measured as alcohol.

His larger concern, he said, is changing public opinion about whether it is safe to drive under the influence of marijuana.

“There’s quite a common perception that you can drive safely under the influence of cannabis,” Dr. Mann said, adding that this view is based in part on now-refuted research from about 20 years ago. “It took quite a while for people’s attitudes about drinking and driving to change.”

The authorities have also faced black-market sales in stores after Mr. Trudeau’s legalization announcement. Cities and provinces have taken different approaches to the black-market shops. In Vancouver, where they are most numerous, officials try to keep control through business licenses. In other areas, particularly Quebec, the police have moved swiftly to close them down.

Mr. Trudeau’s government has repeatedly said that the stores are illegal and will not be a part of the new recreational market.

Brendan Kennedy, the president of Tilray, a licensed medical marijuana producer, said the experience of American states with legalization suggested that the stores will quickly wither away in the face of a legal alternative — provided that “there is adequate supply and adequate locations of legal products.”

Mr. Harel, the police chief, is less certain the black market will vanish anytime soon after legalization.

He anticipates that the illegal market will aggressively promote food laced with marijuana, one of many products that will not immediately be allowed under the new system. In his view, the success of the legal system will rest on swiftly and aggressively shutting down the black market.

“We figure it’s an $8 billion-a-year economy,” he said of illegal marijuana sales. Legalization, he added, will change the dynamics of the black market. “But we don’t think it will fade away.”

Continue reading the main story

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *