Y. Akaiwa, A conceptual design of microcellular radio communication system, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Orlando, FL, May 1990, pp. 156–160Google Scholar
Y. Akaiwa, H. Andoh, Channel segregation - a self organized dynamic channel allocation method: application to TDMA/FDMA microcellular systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 11, 949–954 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L. Anderson, A simulation study of some dynamic channel assignment algorithms in a high capacity mobile telecommunications system. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 22, 210–217 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M.D. Austin, G.L. Stüber, Direction biased handoff algorithms for urban microcells, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, June 1994, pp. 101–105Google Scholar
J.L. Cimini, G. Foschini, Distributed algorithms for dynamic channel allocation in microcellular systems, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Denver, CO, May 1992, pp. 641–644Google Scholar
L.J. Cimini, G.J. Foschini, C.-L. I, Z. Miljanic, Call blocking performance of distributed algorithms for dynamic channel allocation in microcells. IEEE Trans. Commun. 42, 2600–2607 (1994)Google Scholar
L.J. Cimini, G.J. Foschini, L. Shepp, Single-channel user-capacity calculations for self-organizing cellular systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 42, 3137–3143 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D.C. Cox, D.O. Reudnik, A comparison of some channel assignment strategies in large-scale mobile communication systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 20, 190–195 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D.C. Cox, D.O. Reudnik, Increasing channel occupancy in large-scale mobile radio systems: dynamic channel reassignment. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 22, 218–222 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S. Elnoubi, R. Singh, S. Gupta, A new frequency channel assignment algorithm in high capacity mobile communications systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 31, 125–131 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Engel, M. Peritsky, Statistically-optimum dynamic server assignment in systems with interfering servers. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 22, 203–209 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D. Everitt, Traffic capacity of cellular mobile communications systems. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 20, 447–454 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D.E. Everitt, N.W. MacFadyen, Analysis of multicellular mobile radio-telephone systems: a model and evaluation. British Telecom Technol. J. 1, 37–45 (1983)Google Scholar
D. Everitt, D. Manfield, Performance analysis of cellular mobile communication systems with dynamic channel assignment. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 7, 1172–1179 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
G. Falciasecca, M. Frullone, G. Riva, M. Sentinelli, A.M. Serra, Investigation on a dynamic channel allocation for high capacity mobile radio systems, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Philadelphia, PA, (1988), pp. 176–181Google Scholar
H. Furukawa, A. Yoshihiko, Self-organized reuse partitioning, a dynamic channel assignment method in cellular systems, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Secaucus, NJ, May 1993, pp. 524–527Google Scholar
P. Gaasvik, M. Cornefjord, V. Svenson, Different methods of giving priority to handoff traffic in a mobile telephone system with directed retry, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Saint Louis, MO, May 1991, pp. 549–553Google Scholar
D.J. Goodman, S.A. Grandhi, R. Vijayan, Distributed dynamic channel assignment schemes, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Secaucus, NJ, May 1993, pp. 532–535Google Scholar
K. Hanabe, V. Tetsuro, T. Otsu, Distributed adaptive channel allocation scheme with variable C/I threshold in cellular systems, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Secaucus, NJ, May 1993, pp. 164–167Google Scholar
D. Hong, S.S. Rappaport, Traffic model and performance analysis for cellular mobile radio telephone systems with prioritized and nonprioritized handoff procedures. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 35, 77–92 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
W.C. Jakes, Microwave Mobile Communication (IEEE Press, New York, 1993)Google Scholar
H. Jiang, S.S. Rappaport, CBWL: a new channel assignment and sharing method for cellular communication systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 43, 313–322 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T. Kanai, Autonomous reuse partitioning in cellular systems, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Denver, CO, May 1992, pp. 782–785Google Scholar
F.P. Kelly, Reversibility and Stochastic Networks (Wiley, New York, 1979)MATHGoogle Scholar
F.P. Kelly, Blocked probabilities in large circuit-switched networks. Adv. Appl. Probab. 18, 473–505 (1986)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
S.S. Kuek, W.C. Wong, Ordered dynamic channel assignment scheme with reassignment in highway microcells. IEEE Trans. Commun. 41, 271–276 (1992)Google Scholar
S. Nanda, D.J. Goodman, Dynamic resource acquisition: distributed carrier allocation for TDMA cellular systems, in Third Generation Wireless Information Networks (1992), pp. 99–124Google Scholar
K. Okada, A dynamic channel assignment strategy using information of speed and moving direction in microcellular systems, in International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Chicago, IL, May 1993, pp. 2212–2215Google Scholar
K. Okada, F. Kubota, On dynamic channel assignment in cellular mobile radio systems, in International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Singapore, June 1991, pp. 938–941Google Scholar
K. Okada, F. Kubota, A proposal of a dynamic channel assignment strategy with information of moving direction in microcellular systems. Trans. IEICE E75-A, 1667–1673 (1992)Google Scholar
H. Panzer, R. Beck, Adaptive resource allocation in metropolitan area cellular mobile radio systems, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Orlando, FL, May 1990, pp. 638–645Google Scholar
P. Raymond, Performance analysis of cellular networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 39, 1787–1793 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Tajima, K. Imamura, A strategy for flexible channel assignment in mobile communication systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 37, 92–103 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K. Takeo, M. Nishino, Y. Ameazwa, S. Sato, Adaptive traffic control scheme for non-uniform traffic distribution in microcellular mobile communication system, in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Orlando, FL, May 1990, pp. 527–531Google Scholar
S. Tekinay, B. Jabbari, Handover and channel assignment in mobile cellular networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 29, 42–46 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K.A. West, G.L. Stüber, An aggressive dynamic channel assignment strategy for a microcellular environment. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 43, 1027–1038 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K.L. Yeung, T.-S.P. Yum, Compact pattern based channel assignment for cellular mobile systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 43, 892–896 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Zhang, T. Yum, Comparisons of channel-assignment strategies in cellular mobile telephone systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 38, 211–215 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
There are mainly three types of channel allocation 1-fixed channel allocation 2- dynamic channel allocation 3-Hybrid channel allocation fIn radio resource management for wireless and cellular networks, channel allocation schemes allocate bandwidth and communication channels to base stations, access points and terminal equipment. The objective is to achieve maximum system spectral efficiency in bit/s/Hz/site by means of frequency reuse, but still assure a certain grade of service by avoiding co-channel interference and adjacent channel interference among nearby cells or networks that share the bandwidth.
Channel-allocation schemes follow one of two types of strategy:
- Fixed: FCA, fixed channel allocation: manually assigned by the network operator
- DCA, dynamic channel allocation
- DFS, dynamic frequency selection
- Spread spectrum
Static Channel Allocation
In Fixed Channel Allocation or Fixed Channel Assignment (FCA) each cell is given a predetermined set of frequency channels. FCA requires manual frequency planning, which is an arduous task in TDMA and FDMA based systems since such systems are highly sensitive to co-channel interference from nearby cells that are reusing the same channel. Another drawback with TDMA and FDMA systems with FCA is that the number of channels in the cell remains constant irrespective of the number of customers in that cell. This results in traffic congestion and some calls being lost when traffic gets heavy in some cells, and idle capacity in other cells.
If FCA is combined with conventional FDMA and perhaps or TDMA, a fixed number of voice channels can be transferred over the cell. A new call can only be connected by an unused channel. If all the channel are occupied than the new call is blocked in this system. There are however several dynamic radio-resource management schemes that can be combined with FCA. A simple form is traffic-adaptive handover threshold, implying that calls from cell phones situated in the overlap between two adjacent cells can be forced to make the handover to the cell with the lowest load for the moment. If FCA is combined with spread spectrum, the maximum number of channels is not fixed in theory, but in practice a maximum limit is applied, since too many calls would cause too high co-channel interference level, causing the quality to be problematic. Spread spectrum allows cell breathing to be applied, by allowing an overloaded cell to borrow capacity (maximum number of simultaneous calls in the cell) from a nearby cell that is sharing the same frequency.
FCA can be extended into a DCA system by using a borrowing strategy in which a cell can borrow channels from the neighboring cell which is supervised by Mobile Switching Center (MSC).
Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) may be applied in wireless networks with several adjacent non-centrally controlled access points. The access points automatically select frequency channels with low interference levels. DFS is supported by the IEEE 802.11hwireless local area network standard. DFS is also mandated in the 5470-5725 MHz U-NII band for radar avoidance.
Dynamic Channel Allocation
A more efficient way of channel allocation would be Dynamic Channel Allocation or Dynamic Channel Assignment (DCA) in which voice channel are not allocated to cell permanently, instead for every call request base station request channel from MSC. The channel is allocated following an algorithm which accounts the following criteria:
- Future blocking probability in neighboring cells and Reuse distance
- Usage frequency of the candidate channel
- Average blocking probability of the overall system
- Instantaneous channel occupancy distribution
It requires the MSC to collect real time data on channel occupancy, traffic distribution and Received Signal Strength Indications (RSSI). DCA schemes are suggested for TDMA/FDMA based cellular systems such as GSM, but are currently not used in any products.OFDMA systems, such as the downlink of 4G cellular systems, can be considered as carrying out DCA for each individual sub-carrier as well as each timeslot.
DCA can be further classified into centralized and distributed. Some of the centralized DCA schemes are:
- First available (FA): the first available channel satisfying reuse distance requirement is assigned to the call
- Locally optimized dynamic assignment (LODA): cost function is based on the future blocking probability in the neighboring cells
- Selection with maximum usage on the reuse ring (RING): a candidate channel is selected which is in use in the most cells in the co-channel set
DCA and DFS eliminate the tedious manual frequency planning work. DCA also handles bursty cell traffic and utilizes the cellular radio resources more efficiently. DCA allows the number of channels in a cell to vary with the traffic load, hence increasing channel capacity with little costs.
Spread spectrum can be considered as an alternative to complex DCA algorithms. Spread spectrum avoids cochannel interference between adjacent cells, since the probability that users in nearby cells use the same spreading code is insignificant. Thus the frequency channel allocation problem is relaxed in cellular networks based on a combination of spread spectrum and FDMA, for example IS95 and 3G systems. Spread spectrum also facilitate that centrally controlled base stations dynamically borrow resources from each other depending on the traffic load, simply by increasing the maximum allowed number of simultaneous users in one cell (the maximum allowed interference level from the users in the cell), and decreasing it in an adjacent cell. Users in the overlap between the base station coverage area can be transferred between the cells (called cell-breathing), or the traffic can be regulated by admission control and traffic-shaping.
However, spread spectrum gives lower spectral efficiency than non-spread spectrum techniques, if the channel allocation in the latter case is optimized by a good DCA scheme. Especially OFDM modulation is an interesting alternative to spread spectrum because of its ability to combat multipath propagation for wideband channels without complex equalization. OFDM can be extended with OFDMA for uplink multiple access among users in the same cell. For avoidance of inter-cell interference, FDMA with DCA or DFS is once again of interest. One example of this concept is the above mentioned IEEE 802.11h standard. OFDM and OFDMA with DCA is often studied as an alternative for 4G wireless systems.
DCA on a packet-by-packet basis
In packet based data communication services, the communication is bursty and the traffic load rapidly changing. For high system spectrum efficiency, DCA should be performed on a packet-by-packet basis. Examples of algorithms for packet-by-packet DCA are Dynamic Packet Assignment (DPA), Dynamic Single Frequency Networks (DSFN) and Packet and resource plan scheduling (PARPS).
- ^Guowang Miao, Jens Zander, Ki Won Sung, and Ben Slimane, Fundamentals of Mobile Data Networks, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 1107143217, 2016.
- ^"5GHz agreement". Ntia.doc.gov. 2003-01-31. Retrieved 2012-08-29.